Home Blog Page 4

Laleli’s Global Ascension

0

A Hub of Hospitality and Fashion Innovation

Unlocking Potential: 600 Hotels, Hundreds of Restaurants, and Countless Opportunities

Daily Dynamics and Employment Impact

Laleli, with its pulsating energy, hosts nearly 300 thousand individuals daily, creating a bustling hub of activity. Beyond its vibrant streets, Laleli is transforming into the potential World Fashion Center, employing an average of one million people and impacting countless families.

Technological Advancements and Evolved Production Landscape

The shift from small workshops in Kumpaki, Zeytinburnu, and Merter to modern facilities ranging from 10,000 to 30,000 square meters marks a significant evolution Laleli Emerges as the Global Fashion Hub. High-tech companies, equipped with stylists and fashion specialists tuned into global trends, now produce goods with a higher added value. This transition has not only revolutionized production but also influenced the investment landscape, with companies channeling resources into these advanced facilities.

Changing Consumer Behavior From Necessities to Refinement

The evolution in consumer behavior is evident. Previously, clients sought basic items to fulfill their needs, but today, a more affluent clientele demands sophistication and follows global fashion trends. These consumers, having traveled to fashion capitals like France, Italy, and Britain, find comparable goods in Turkey at more affordable prices and superior quality Turkey Sightseeing.

Global Presence and Export Prowess

The allure of Laleli’s fashion extends far beyond Turkey’s borders. Exporting to over 50 countries, including America, Russia, the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe, Laleli has become synonymous with quality, original styles, and diversity. In each of these countries, a renowned Turkish brand of Laleli origin can be found, showcasing the global impact and recognition of this emerging fashion hub.

Laleli Emerges as the Global Fashion Hub

0

Reviving from Ashes

Ayhan Karahan, President of the Association of the Industrialists and Businessmen of Laleli (LASiAD), shares insights into Laleli’s fashion dominance.

Strategic Vision for Global Fashion Leadership

According to Ayhan Karahan, the future leaders in the global fashion industry will hail from Laleli. The missing link, he asserts, lies in the presentation and image of the country on the international stage.

Unprecedented Demand and Market Prowess

Karahan emphasizes that the luggage trade, which originated in small rooms, under staircases, and at corners in the old business buildings of Laleli, has become an unstoppable force. This market, catering to a population of 600 million from regions like the collapsed USSR, Central Asia, Middle East, Central Europe, Balkan States, Caucasia, and North Africa, poses a significant challenge for any country. Laleli, with its extensive experience in luggage tourism, has managed to accommodate 50 thousand clients a day without state aid. The remarkable feat of delivering goods from Italy to clients in just 3 days showcases the unparalleled efficiency of this region BOYTAM. Laleli’s capacity for speed, adaptation, and problem-solving has allowed it to transform the impossible into a reality.

Renewal after Crisis and Global Recognition

Post the 1998 crisis in Russia, Laleli underwent a renewal process, showcasing its adaptability to new conditions and an exceptional ability to find swift solutions. The natural filtration of companies led to the survival of those capable of adapting. Laleli is now home to hundreds of brands, and its competitors are no longer the Far East countries targeting cheap markets but Europe itself Sightseeing Turkey.

Chic Transformation and Global Competitiveness

Laleli’s skyline is a testament to its chic transformation, with buildings adorned in external coating materials and showrooms shining brightly. The once regional hub is now globally competitive, with nearly twenty thousand companies contributing to its status as a fashion powerhouse. As Laleli shines with its clientele, it establishes itself as a force to be reckoned with in the world of fashion.

BOYTAM

0

Preserving Bozcaada’s Essence Unveiling History Through BOYTAM

Exploring the Island’s Rich Heritage

Hakan Guruney’s insatiable desire for collecting artifacts, coupled with his profound commitment to learning and teaching, has transformed what many considered mere dreams into reality. Visitors to Bozcaada are encouraged to immerse themselves in the island’s history by exploring BOYTAM, the Bozcaada Local History and Research Center. This invaluable resource houses a vast collection of over 3,000 documents and objects, offering an unparalleled insight into the island’s past.

A Gateway to History BOYTAM’s Treasures

BOYTAM is a treasure trove for those eager to delve into Bozcaada’s history. The center boasts a diverse array of materials, including Ottoman Oriental Annals, Provincial Annals, Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives Documents, travel records, maps, pictures, photographs, engravings, and postal cards. Spread across two floors, BOYTAM is a repository of used items, photographs, and the fading hues of experiences that, though on the brink of being forgotten Laleli’s Global Ascension, persist in the memories of the island’s old artisans, local townsfolk, streets, houses, tavernkeepers, and barbers.

Preserving Memories A Glimpse into Bozcaada’s Soul

BOYTAM stands as a testament to Guruney’s dedication to preserving the island’s cultural heritage. It breathes life into forgotten stories, weaving a narrative that connects the present to the past. Through the lens of historical artifacts and personal mementos, visitors are transported to a bygone era, gaining a deeper appreciation for Bozcaada’s rich tapestry.

An Unforgettable Experience Leaving Your Heart in Bozcaada

As you explore BOYTAM and witness the echoes of the island’s history, a profound connection forms. The memories encapsulated within its walls linger Private Turkey Tours, leaving an indelible mark on your heart. Bozcaada becomes more than a destination; it transforms into a cherished chapter in your own story, forever etched in the echoes of “Bozcaada.”

Theoderic by Eutharic and Amalasuntha

0

Athalaric, the grandchild of Theoderic by Eutharic and Amalasuntha, was the new king in all but fact. His widowed mother was the effective regent of the state, relying on a cadre of civilian and military officials already at court. We are less well equipped with any narrative of affairs during her regency than for adjacent periods, but it appears to have been mainly stable and a continuation of what had been known under Theoderic. From 526 to 534, the Theoderician era continued without the man who had made it. The terminology of civilitas returned to the royal documents after a few years in abeyance, but was addressed only to civilians, not the army. A Gothic name, Tuluin, appears on the list of senators, while in roughly the same years the Roman name Cyprian belongs to a father whose children were educated to the language and ways of the army.

About Amalasuntha’s son

Disaster loomed. We should not trust the standard story about Amalasuntha’s son and his end, yet we must tell it. Amalasuntha, we are told, put the boy in the care of three grave, prudent older Goths, but others were unhappy and “because of their eagerness to wrong their subjects, they wished to be ruled by him more after the barbarian fashion.” A dialogue, surely made up long after, recounts how Amalasuntha defended her style of educating her son against Gothic critics, who succeeded in taking control of the boy and giving him over to companions who “as soon as he came of age, enticed him to drunkenness and to intercourse with women, making him an exceptionally depraved youth, and of such stupid folly that he was disinclined to follow his mother’s advice.”34 He plunged in short order into the depths of a wasting disease and died on October 10, 534, still a teenager coastal bulgaria holidays.

This moralizing reading appears twenty years later, from the skepti¬cal historian Procopius of Constantinople, and he burdens it with several overlays. It shows the Italian regime to disadvantage while preparing us for the claim that the barbarian regime was deteriorating and thus appropriately an object of military intervention from outside. The cartoonish barbarians who sent Athalaric to his grave with wine, women, and song are what one would expect in such a story, but these caricatures bear no resemblance to any Italian reality we know of. There were surely differences of opinion within the Italian court, and the young king could well have been a political football between factions, with his death an opportunity for blaming and posturing on all sides. The division is unlikely to have been between Roman and Goth; rather, it would have been between civilian and military, with the advocates of a strong defense seizing control of the young man’s future.

Think of Boethius?

One short note: What should we think of Boethius? The fame of his popularized version of Plato in the Consolation in later centuries is real and his book stands on its merits. Its encouragement of quiet withdrawal from public life is in tune with a culture that would eschew ambition and wealth—at least in principle—but the message is at the very least controversial and worth controverting. Boethius’s actions and his career make sense in their place and time. If he grasped at the brass ring, missed, and then paid for his attempt with his life, he was no more and no less than a typical Roman aristocrat of any age and can scarcely be judged otherwise than as having misjudged his moment. Would Justinian have been happier to have Boethius in command in Italy than Theoderic’s heirs? Would Italy and later history have been spared some of Justinian’s mad restorationism ? The effort Boethius made, if it makes him out to be less an otherworldly philosopher than we have thought, might not have been so ill-advised as first appears Theoderic or Boethius saw.

Theoderic’s death offers

Theoderic’s death offers an opportunity to take a deep breath and look around the Mediterranean at the state of the Roman empire in the year 526. This is arguably the last moment of genuinely ancient history when it makes sense to take collective stock like this, when the totality of what Rome created could still be thought of as one community.

The government that had begun doing business on seven hills in the Tiber valley in 753 BCE (the legendary date of Romulus’s founding of the city) or 509 BCE (the traditional date of the founding of the republic) was still fully alive and well and collecting taxes. It had moved its corporate headquarters to Constantinople almost exactly 200 years earlier, and flourished as a result. Two hundred years is a long time. At a distance of 1,500 years, many people, places, and events seem crowded close together by a foreshortening of the historical time line, but Constantine and his epochal changes (founding Constantinople, privileging Christianity) were as far in the past then as Napoleon and Thomas Jefferson are from us today.

Theoderic or Boethius saw

0

If it then happened that this man and his colleagues were in correspondence with leading figures in Constantinople and if they were known to have supported reconciliation with Constantinople going back to the years of the Laurentian schism and then the years of bringing the Acacian schism to a halt, and if they had relatives and colleagues at court—then anything might be possible.

To be fair, there is no direct evidence that either Theoderic or Boethius saw things this way, but we do have every reason to believe that this idea must have been in the air. It would not take much in the way of suspicion for what might now seem to be—might then have been—only a pipe dream to take the shape of a real possibility and threat. In that setting, Boethius’s remarks reported in the Consolation were at the very least astonishingly indiscreet and risky, and may have dug the hole deeper, especially once the accusations were abroad and Boethius himself was imprisoned. Whether or not the charges had merit, Theoderic would be a fool not to take them seriously by this point. When Pope Hormisdas—the pope who had made peace with Constantinople—died in August 523 and Pope John I, a friend of Boethius and a collaborator with him in theological debates, replaced Hormisdas, Theoderic had to react adventure balkan tours.

Boethius paid for his indiscretion—or his ambition—with his life. With Theoderic in residence at his palace in Pavia and Boethius there as court official, he was held in custody with his accused coconspirator Albi- nus in a baptistery. Theoderic summoned the prefect of the city of Rome, Eusebius, to Pavia and there condemned Boethius to death in absentia. Then they took him out for execution. The Anonymus Valesianus has it that a rope was tied so tightly around his head that his eyes bulged in their sockets, and then he was beaten to death.33 His sons, the child consuls of 522, were allowed to live.

Immediately sent a delegation from Ravenna

Theoderic, seeing his regime still at risk, immediately sent a delegation from Ravenna to Constantinople, led by Pope John himself, to confirm that assurances of religious peace would be observed and that Arianism would be respected. Theoderic particularly asked that people who had been forced to convert from Arianism to orthodoxy be restored to their original state—but for an emperor eager to be seen as devout, this request was impossible to accept. Pope John refused to carry the message at first, but Theoderic forced him and his delegation of bishops and senators to board ship and make their way to Constantinople.

Once there, the emperor Justin came out to greet them with all respect, welcoming the pope “as if he were blessed Peter himself” and confirming that those who had left Arianism were safe forever and could not be restored to their original error. While they were away, if the Anonymus Valesianus has the sequence right, Theoderic summoned Boethius’s father-in-law, Symmachus, from Rome to Ravenna; tried him on trumped- up charges; and put him to death lest he take any subversive steps out of grief for his dead son-in-law. When the pope returned to Ravenna, the king made his disfavor clear, and within a few days John was dead. No one says there was foul play, but it was at least a foul moment. When a man possessed by a demon attended Pope John’s funeral, he was miraculously and suddenly released from his torment. The crowd saw this as a sign of the pope’s holiness and took him out to burial while making wonderworking relics out of the papal clothes.

There is much debate over the dates of these events, but it is safe to put them all in the years 524-525. If a coup had indeed been in the making, Theoderic had succeeded in putting it down. The line of succession continued in his own family Boethius’s presentation requires.

Anonymus Valesianus

Theoderic came to his own end in 526, and by then the author of the Anonymus Valesianus is fully against him. So maddened was Theoderic, the story goes, that he issued an edict that the Arians would seize the or¬thodox basilicas on the very next Sunday. This could not have been more than a token gesture—perhaps a single basilica—a symbolic gesture to protest what Theoderic saw as Justin’s comparable interference. Then Theoderic fell victim to the same power that had destroyed Arius, the teacher for whom Arianism was named. Following the traditional story, just as Arius had died of dysentery, so too Theoderic fell ill of it and died on the third day, the very day he had intended to seize the holy basilicas. He was in his early seventies.

We needn’t believe more than that Theoderic died with rumor and hostility in the air and at least some of his legacy in question. The summer after he died, there appears to have been a fear of a sea invasion from the east, and our source praises Cassiodorus as one of the new king’s ministers for swift action designed to keep a sharp watch on the seafront and protect Italy from invasion. He even paid troops out of his own pocket to ensure obedience.

Boethius’s presentation requires

0

Boethius’s presentation requires the historian-detective to offer several observations. First, wanting the senate to be safe and hoping for Rome’s liberty are either meaningless platitudes or else specific political crimes in a context about which we know too little. Second, Boethius does not deny them. Third, the expostulation about the preposterousness of hoping for liberty at this moment in its own way confirms rather than confutes suspicion—for surely the offense lay in suggesting that Theoderic’s regime was deprived of liberty at all.

Dramatic stage for us to contemplate

Boethius then sets a dramatic stage for us to contemplate. “You recall” (he tells the allegorical woman called Philosophy, his personification for wisdom itself visiting him in prison to hear and sanctify his lament) “the time the king was at Verona, hell-bent on destroying us all, and how he tried to take the accusation of a crime of maiestas leveled against Albinus and make it encompass the whole senate. And then you recall how I defended the innocence of the whole senate at great risk to myself.”

Apparently that is what has landed him, without trial, in prison, 500 miles from Rome and home, where he wrote his lament. The king suspected treason in his court and Boethius forthrightly defended the suspects—too forthrightly, too persuasively for his own good bulgaria holidays.

Worse is yet to come. Those who seek to destroy Boethius added a charge of sacrilege—that is, of having defiled himself with black magic “out of ambition for high office.” The simple meaning to his contemporaries would be that he had engaged in secret religious rites of the old order (as we saw some of his contemporaries in the senate doing a few years earlier) to advance his own career. Preposterous, he huffs; impossible to imagine the likes of me doing the likes of that!

What can be going on here? The answer is straightforward and not hard to see in Boethius’s own Consolation, although most readers pass right over it. “But you, [Philosophy], approved this remark from the mouth of Plato:32 ‘Republics would be happy if either the philosophers ruled them or if their rulers came to study philosophy.’ ” Boethius goes on to represent that precept as what led him to public life, and I think most readers assume that it justifies a modest entry into upper bureaucracy. The true meaning is too obvious.

Theoderic was not merely paranoid: he had a real enemy. Boethius wanted to be emperor himself—or, more precisely, he wanted to be Plato’s philosopher king.

Boethius

Think of it this way. If you were Boethius, if you were a senior minister at the imperial court of Italy, if you had an impeccable pedigree and the very highest imaginable social standing, and if you saw that the reigning ruler (emperor or would-be emperor Theoderic by Eutharic and Amalasuntha) was nearing his end without a satisfactory heir in place, what would you think should be done or could be done? Who was there that a Roman of this period would think better qualified or better positioned to succeed Theoderic?

And if your neighbors thought you were using black magic to advance your ambitions, what did they think you were aiming for? A one-step promotion to the highest civil office of praetorian prefect? Nonsense: patience and good behavior could get him that. Wouldn’t they assume he was looking at the big step, up to the throne itself?

Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 121

0

Boniface ıs Killed ın a Battle Against the Bulgarians

When the marquis had come to Messinopolis, he did not remain there more than five days before he rode forth, by the advice of the Greeks of the land, on an expedition to the mountain of Messinopolis, which was distant a long day’s journey. And when he had been through the land, and was about to depart, the Bulgarians of the land collected and saw that the marquis had but a small force with him. So they came from all parts and attacked the rear-guard. And when the marquis heard the shouting, he leapt on a horse, all unarmed as he was, with a lance in his hand. And when he came together, where the Bulgarians were fighting with the rear-guard, hand to hand, he ran in upon them, and drove them a great way back.

Then was the Marquis Boniface of Montferrat wounded with an arrow, in the thick of the arm, beneath the shoulder, mortally, and he began to lose blood. And when his men saw it, they began to be dismayed, and to lose heart, and to bear themselves badly. Those who were round the marquis held him up, and he was losing much blood; and he began to faint. And when his men perceived that he could give them no farther help, they were the more dismayed, and began to desert him. So were they discomfited by misadventure; and those who remained by him-and they were but fewwere killed.

The head of the Marquis Boniface of Montferrat was cut off, and the people of the land sent it to Johannizza; and that was one of the greatest joys that ever Johannizza had. Alas! what a dolorous mishap for the Emperor Henry, and for all the Latins of the land of Roumania, to lose such a man by such a misadventure-one of the best barons and most liberal, and one of the best knights in the world! And this misadventure befell in the year of the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, twelve hundred and seven.

Read More about Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 61

Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 120

0

On the morrow the Emperor Henry, and the host of the French departed thence, and marched day by day till they came to Adrianople; and they stored therein the corn and other provisions that they brought with them. The emperor sojourned in the field before the city some fifteen days.

Homage Rendered by Boniface to the Emperor, and by Geoffry of Villehardouin to Boniface

At that time Boniface, the Marquis of Montferrat, who was at Seres, which he had fortified, rode forth as far as Messinopolis, and all the land surrendered to his will. Then he took messengers, and sent them to the Emperor Henry, and told him that he would right willingly speak with him by the river that runs below Cypsela. Now they two had never been able to speak together face to face since the conquest of the land, for so many enemies lay between them that the one had never been able to come to the other.

And when the emperor and those of his councilheardthat themarquis Boniface was at Messinopolis, they rejoiced greatly; and the emperor sent back word by the messengers that he would speak with the marquis on the day appointed.

So the emperor went thitherward, and he left Conon of Bethune to guard the land near Adrianople, with one hundred knights. And they came on the set day to the place of meeting in a very fair field, near the city of Cypsela. The emperor came from one side, and the marquis from the other, and they met with very great joy; nor is that to be wondered at, seeing they had not, of a long time, beheld one another.

And the marquis asked the emperor for tidings of his daughter Agnes; and the emperor told him she was with child, and the marquis was glad thereof and rejoiced. Then did the marquis become liegeman to the emperor, and held from him his land, as he had done from the Emperor Baldwin, his brother. And the marquis gave to Geoffry of Villehardouin, Marshal of Roumania and Champagne, the city of Messinopolis, and all its appurtenances, or else that of Seres, whichever he liked best; and the Marshal became his liegeman, save in so far as he owed fealty to the emperor of Constantinople.

They sojourned thus in that field for two days, in great joy, and said that, as God had granted that they should come together, so might they yet again defeat their enemies. And they made agreement to meet at the end of the summer, in the month of October, with all their forces, in the meadow before the city of Adrianople, and make war against the King of Wallachia. So they separated joyous and well content. The marquis went to Messinopolis, and the Emperor Henry towards Constantinople.

Read More about Bulgaria trips

Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 119

0

Then the Emperor Henry repaired to Constantinople, and undertook once more to go to Adrianople with as many men as he could collect. He assembled his host at Selymbria; and so much time had already passed that this did not take place till after the feast of St. John, in June (1207). And he rode day by day till he came to Adrianople, and encamped in the fields before the city. And those within the city, who had greatly desired his coming, went out to meet him in procession, and received him very gladly.. And all the Greeks of the land came with them.

The emperor remained only one day before the city to see all the damage that Johannizza had done to the walls and towers, with mines and petraries; and these had worked great havoc to the city. And on the morrow he departed’, and marched towards the country of Johannizza, and so marched for four days. On the fifth day he came to the foot of the mountain of Wallachia, to a city called Euloi, which Johannizza had newly repeopled with his folk. And when the people of the land saw the host coming, they abandoned the city, and fled into the mountains.

The Emperor’s Foragers Suffer Loss

The Emperor Henry and the host of the French encamped before the city; and the foraging parties overran the land and captured oxen, and cows, and beeves in great plenty and other beasts. And those from Adrianople, who had brought their chariots with them, and were poor and illfurnished with food, loaded their chariots with corn and other grain; and they found also provisions in plenty and loaded with them, in great quantities, the other chariots that they had captured. So the host sojoumed there for three days; and every day the foraging parties went foraging throughout the land; but the land was full of mountains, and strong defiles, and the host lost many foragers, who adventured themselves madly.

In the end, the Emperor Henry sent Anscau of Cayeux to guard the foragers, and Eustace his brother, and Thierri of Flanders, his nephew, and Walter of Escomai, and John Bliaud. Their four battalions went to guard the foragers, and entered into a land rough and mountainous. And when their people had overrun the land, and wished to return, they found the defiles very well guarded.

For the Wallachians of the country had assembled, and fought against them, and did them great hurt, both to men and horses. Hardly were our men put to it to escape discomfiture; and the knights had, of necessity, to dismount and go on foot. But by God’s help they returned to the camp, though not without great loss and damage.

Read More about Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 30

Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 118

0

When the emperor had passed over the straits of St. George, he set his troops in array, and rode day by day till he came to Nicomedia. When the people of Theodore Lascaris, and his brothers, who formed the host, heard thereof, they drew back, and passed over the mountain on the other side, towards Nice.

And the emperor encamped by Nicomedia in a very fair field that lay beside the river on this side of the mountain. He had his tents and pavilions pitched; and caused his men to overrun and harry the land, because the people had rebelled when they heard that Thierri of Loos, the seneschal, was taken; and the emperor’s men captured much cattle and many prisoners.

Truce with Theodore Lascaris – The Emperor Invades the Lands of Johannizza

The Emperor Henry sojoumed after this manner for five days in the meadow by Nicomedia. And while he was thus sojourning, Theodore Lascaris took messengers, and sent them to him, asking him to make a truce for two years, on condition that the emperor would suffer him to demolish Skiza and the fortress of the church of St. Sophia of Nicomedia, while he, on his side, would yield up all the prisoners taken in the last victory, or at other times of whom he had a great many in his land.

Now the emperor took council with his people; and they said that they could not maintain two wars at the same time, and that it was better to suffer loss as proposed than suffer the loss of Adrianople, and the land on the other side of the straits; and moreover that they.would (by agreeing to this truce) cause division between their enemies, viz. Johannizza, the King of Wallachia and Bulgaria and Theodore Lascaris who were now friends, and helped one another in the war.

The matter was thus settled and agreed to. Then the Emperor Henry summoned Peter of Bracieux from Skiza; and he came to him; and the Emperor Henry so wrought with him that he gave up Skiza into his hands, and the emperor delivered it to Theodore Lascaris to be demolished, as also the church of St. Sophia of Nicomedia. So was the truce established, and so were the fortresses demolished. Thierri of Loos was given up, and all the other prisoners.

Read More about Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade part 93